|
||||||
| Engine / Turbo / Supercharger / Drivetrain Everything from engine builds to the best clutch and flywheel. |
ItzBoosted.net ShoutBox
[Archives]
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
||||||
![]() |
|
||||
|
Here are my thoughts, opinions..
Not divided, the manifold is still open inside Not sure what you are saying here, but essentially cyl 1&2 feed one turbo, and 3&4 feed the second. not designed to have pressure from cyl4 come back to feed the first turbo.... I agree, and it's not the way I would do it. i would do banjo AN fittings but that also is much more expensive. |
|
||||
|
Since in a stock manifold, cyl 1&2 pretty much have a straight in shot to the turbo, 3 and 4 make a hard turn and there are upraised sections of the exhaust floor to direct the flow from 3 &4 to better route it to join 1 &2 and go into the turbo. When you weld on the second section of manifold for the 2md turbo, the flow patterns seem to me like they would still route flow directed towards the original turbo location.
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
+1............. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|